Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

2 Subjects

Weekly Student Analysis Paper

Weekly Student Analysis Paper

Q Once the draft is complete and changes have been made please attach the Weekly Student Analysis Paper/Presentation Final Draft here. This will be how I grade it. On the week your topic is due, you must post to: • this assignment portal by Sunday at midnight. • and to the discussion board by 11:59 pm on Thursday. Every week will have a link back to this portal for your final submission -- you will need to go back to week 1 for the first draft portal to check your use of outside sources. For grading expectations, please view the rubric Download rubricbelow. Rubric HUM 360 Analysis Paper Presentation Rubric 100 points (1) HUM 360 Analysis Paper Presentation Rubric 100 points (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of information 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Demonstrates thorough understanding of the information presented in the resources. The informational paper can be used as an example for other students. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Demonstrates a thoughtful understanding of the issues presented in both resources. 19 to >17.0 pts Acceptable Demonstrates a basic understanding of the issues presented in both resources. 17 to >14.0 pts Marginal Demonstrates a limited understanding of the issues presented in both resources. This informational paper needs revision. 14 to >0 pts Poor Demonstrates little or no understanding the issues presented in both resources. This analysis needs revision. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of evidence from class resources (must use two) 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Uses specific and convincing examples from the texts studied to support claims, making insightful and applicable connections between texts. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Uses relevant examples from the texts studied to support claims, making applicable connections between texts. 19 to >17.0 pts Acceptable Uses examples from the texts to support most claims with some connections made between texts. 17 to >14.0 pts Marginal Uses incomplete (only one text) or vaguely developed examples to partially support claims with no connections made between texts. 14 to >0 pts Poor Minimal or no examples from the texts are used and claims are unsupported and irrelevant to the topic. 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Citations and References 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Cites all quotes, paraphrases, and summaries correctly in the body of the text and has a complete and correctly formatted references page. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Cites most quotes, paraphrases, and summaries correctly in the body of the text and has a complete and mostly correctly formatted references page. 19 to >17.0 pts Acceptable Cites some quotes, paraphrases, and summaries correctly in the body of the text and has a few incomplete and/or incorrectly formatted references page. 17 to >14.0 pts Marginal Cites many quotes, paraphrases, and summaries incorrectly in the body of the text and has a mostly incomplete and/or incorrectly formatted references page. 14 to >0 pts Poor Missing in-text citations, presenting quotes as paraphrases, or author’s ideas as one’s own. Missing references page (Automatic zero and escalation to Academic Affairs) 25 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent Demonstrates control of the conventions of professional academic English with essentially no errors, even with stylistically appropriate language. 22 to >19.0 pts Good Demonstrates control of the conventions of professional academic English, exhibiting occasional errors only when using sophisticated language. (2-3 errors) 19 to >17.0 pts Acceptable Demonstrates partial control of the conventions of professional academic English, exhibiting occasional errors that do not hinder comprehension. (4-5 errors) 17 to >14.0 pts Marginal Demonstrates limited control of the conventions of professional academic English, exhibiting frequent errors that make comprehension difficult.(6-7 errors) 14 to >0 pts Poor Demonstrates little or no control of the conventions of professional academic English, making comprehension almost impossible. (8+ errors) 25 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

By the end of the 15th century, the strong influence of the Renaissance over Europe was slowly coming to an end. Classicism art which dominated the art scene during this time was still regarded as perfection, however in the 16th century a new style of art would emerge known as mannerism. The mannerism style of art still shared some characteristics of classicism art but would end up being known for its new characteristics that will later bring both praise and criticism from future Historians. Mannerism style of art had a strong influence in the 16th century Europe.